|
Volume 7, Article 5
A. Petersson
Division of Solid State Physics, Lund University, Box 118, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden
and
Crystal Fibre A/S, Blokken 84, DK-3460 Birkerød, Denmark
Anders Gustafsson , L. Samuelson
Division of Solid State Physics, Lund University, Box 118, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Satoru Tanaka
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Kita, 12-Nishi 6, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812 Japan
Yoshinobu Aoyagi
The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN)
III-V nitrides, and especially the ternary compounds of AlGaN, are technologically important for the fabrication of light emitting diodes and laser diodes emitting light in the blue and UV region [1]. These compounds are also important for the development and fabrication of high power and high frequency devices [2]. AlGaN is generally used as the barrier material for GaN or GaInN quantum structures, mainly quantum wells. One of the most serious problems concerning the epitaxial growth of high quality AlGaN epitaxially on substrates of sapphire and SiC, is the large lattice mismatch and the differences in thermal expansion coefficients between the substrate and the AlGaN film. These unfavorable conditions for growth make it difficult to obtain high quality AlGaN films and it is essential to develop an understanding of the factors that are crucial for obtaining a high crystal quality.
In this investigation, the structural and optical properties of AlGaN epitaxial films were studied. Spatially resolved, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-based cathodoluminescence (CL) at low temperatures (15-80K), was used to investigate the quality of the epitaxial film. This was done in both top view and cross-section. CL is one of the most powerful methods for characterizing small alloy fluctuations in AlGaN films, on a sub-micrometer scale, with a precision difficult to surpass with any other available technique. This makes CL an important diagnostic tool in the development of high quality AlGaN epitaxial films. The epitaxial films were also investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FSEM).
The geometrical structure of epitaxial films is usually determined by methods
such as SEM, TEM, AFM, and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Variations in
the composition of an epitaxial film can, to some extent, be determined by SEM,
TEM and STM, but to acquire more detail about the composition, methods such as
X-ray diffraction spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, Auger
spectroscopy, secondary ion mass spectroscopy and particle induced X-ray
emission must be used. In this work, the high spatial resolution of CL and
variations in the peak energy position of the luminescence were used to show
variations in the composition of the epitaxial films. It would be difficult, if
not impossible, to simultaneously study the spatial variations in composition
with the same level of precision using any other method. Spectrally resolved
luminescence is a sensitive probe of the AlxGa1-xN
composition; a variation of 0.01 in x gives a shift in energy of
28 meV, with an increase in the Al content giving an increase in the
position of the emission energy. However, this method must be used with the
greatest care, since the AlGaN composition is not the only parameter that
alters the peak energy position of the luminescence of an AlGaN layer. The
energy position
may also be influenced by crystal polytypes, strain, the presence of
impurities, sample temperature, quantum effects and excitation density. To
justify the interpretation of the results obtained by CL, the effects of the
other potential sources must be accounted for. It is worth pointing out that
there are two origins of the strain in an AlGaN layer on SiC [3]. One is from
the actual lattice mismatch between the substrate and the epitaxial film, which
introduces an in-plane compressive strain in the epitaxial film. The second
component is from the significant difference in thermal expansion of the two.
This introduces an additional in-plane tensile strain as the sample is cooled
down from the growth temperature. It is generally considered that the epitaxial
film will relax
during growth, and the major strain in the films at room temperature is related
to
differences in the thermal expansion. As an example, tensile strain has been
reported to introduce shifts from
4 meV [4] [5] to
16 meV [6],
in the case of GaN. The factors contributing to the full width at half maximum
(FWHM) of the luminescence from the present AlGaN films were investigated, and
it will be shown below that a significant contribution can be attributed to
alloy fluctuations on a micrometer scale.
The samples in this work were grown in a conventional horizontal-type, low-pressure metal organic chemical vapor deposition system on the Si face of on-axis 6H-SiC (0001), using a growth temperature of 1080°C and the precursors TMAl, TMGa and NH3. The structure was fabricated by starting at the SiC interface with a 1-3 nm thick AlN buffer layer, followed by a 0.5 µm thick Al0.12Ga0.88N layer. The layers are nominally undoped, but there can be a significant unintentional Si doping originating from the substrate [7]. Details of the growth can be found elsewhere [8].
To
study the structure of the epitaxial films on a large scale, we investigated
the samples in top view and cross section using high resolution FSEM. In this
study, the experimental spatial resolution was better than 10 nm. Images
recorded in top-view (not shown here) displayed no features, indicating a
smooth surface and, therefore, a uniform film, on the SEM scale. The SEM images
of the cleaved sample were recorded with the sample tilted
30 degrees
away from the growth direction. SEM images recorded from the cleaved edge of a
sample, as shown in figure 1, also display a uniform film on the 10 nm
scale. The thickness of the film was found to be
700 nm. No SEM images
recorded normal
to the cleaved plane are shown, since the secondary electron signal from the
edge of the sample was very strong. This large variation in intensity over the
image makes interpretation of such images difficult.
The surface of a 6H-SiC substrate was characterized by AFM, in order to
investigate the possible influence of surface morphology on the subsequent
epitaxial growth. This study revealed the presence of what appears to be
scratches on the surface of the substrate. An AFM image of a typical substrate
surface is presented in figure 2. The scratches, originating from mechanical
polishing of the surface, display a characteristic pattern. The width of the
scratches is typically
500 nm and the depth is as large as 30 nm. The
scratches are randomly oriented, which leads us to exclude that they are
growth-related structures or defects in the substrate. They would be related to
certain crystallographic directions, rather than being randomly distributed, as
in the AFM images. Between the scratches, the SiC surface is flat within the
resolution of the AFM.
AFM measurements of the surface of a typical epitaxial AlGaN film reveal two
types of patterns, figure 3. First, the surface displays a terrace-like
structure, with a typical width of
2000 nm and a typical step height
of
5 nm. This structure is typical for III-nitrides and is referred to
as mosaic or columnar structure [9]. Assuming atomically flat terraces, this
implies a tilt of the entire film in the order of 0.2 degrees away from
the [0 0 0 1] growth direction. This could be related either to
substrate tilt or a tilt induced by strain relaxation. Second, a comparison of
the AFM images of figure 2 and figure 3 shows that a pattern similar to that of
the deep scratches, observed on the surface of the SiC substrate (figure 2),
was also present on the surface of the epitaxial film (figure 3). In the
epitaxial film, the pattern is present in the form of slightly higher terrace
steps (
10 nm in height). It is somewhat surprising that the pattern is
still visible after 700 nm of growth.
Epitaxial films grown under similar conditions were investigated by TEM (not shown here). High resolution TEM micrographs, as well as the TEM diffraction patterns, displayed only the wurtzite structure of the AlGaN in these films. The TEM investigations revealed that the AlGaN film grew with the c-axis perpendicular to the growth direction, as expected. Furthermore, no microcracks were observed in the TEM study.
The
CL data in this study was obtained at low temperature, generally 15-20 K,
and at low acceleration voltages of 3-5 kV. A typical, spatially averaged (from
a region of 20 by 20 µm2) luminescence spectrum is shown in
figure 4. An acceleration voltage of 3 kV was used, giving a penetration depth
(Grün range) of 100 nm [10]. Assuming a very short diffusion length
(<100 nm in GaN [11]) of the generated carriers in the AlGaN film, the
major part of the observed luminescence originates from the top 100 nm of
the film. The main peak at 3.723 eV, denoted "AlGaN", is attributed to the
recombination of excitons in the epitaxial film [12]. On the low-energy side of
the main peak, there is a less intense peak, denoted "LO1". The energy of this
peak is
90 meV lower than that of the main peak and is assumed to be
the first phonon replica (longitudinal optical phonon) of the main peak. The
weaker peaks; "LO2" and "LO3" are believed to be the second and third phonon
replicas, respectively. The FWHM of the excitonic peak in figure 4 is 34 meV,
which is comparable with what has been reported [13] [14]. It was also found
that the spatial distribution of the luminescence intensity was rather uniform.
This was determined using monochromatic CL images, recorded at the peak energy
position of the excitonic luminescence. In these images, the smallest features
that can be resolved are
250 nm in size. This seems to indicate that
the film is uniform and the width of the luminescence peak is related to
variations on a scale smaller than 250 nm. However, more detailed
investigations reveal that the AlGaN epitaxial films have a more complex
structure. In the remainder of this article, measurements showing different
aspects of the structure of the films will be presented.
The spatial distribution of the luminescence from the sample was investigated by recording a series of CL images at different emission energies. Three of these images are presented in figure 5. The used acceleration voltage of 5 kV mainly probes the top 250 nm, as discussed above. The first CL image, figure 5(b), was recorded at 3.72 eV, corresponding to the peak position of the main luminescence peak. The intensity variations on a large spatial scale observed in this image are caused by spatial variations in the efficiency of the detection system used here, and are common to all CL images recorded at this low magnification. The weak intensity variations, on a small spatial scale, give the impression that the luminescence from the epitaxial film is highly uniform. But this is only true for images recorded at the peak energy position. For images recorded at a higher energy, 3.74 eV (figure 5(c)), and a lower energy, 3.70 eV (figure 5(a)), this is no longer true. The most striking features observed in figure 5(a) and (c) are the bright/dark lines in the images. The two images show complementary contrast variations, where a bright line in one image is dark in the other, and vice versa. This behavior indicates variations in the peak energy position of the luminescence. We will tentatively attribute this to a spatial variation of the bandgap of the AlGaN. Furthermore, the pattern of lines resembles the pattern of the scratches from the mechanical polishing, previously observed in the AFM image, figure 2, of the surface of the SiC substrate. As discussed above, the same type of pattern can be found on the surface of the epitaxial film as well, figure 3. This type of pattern indicates that the bandgap variations could be related to terrace steps on the surface of the film. The comparison above of the AFM images of the substrate and of the film, indicates a relation between the surface structures. This suggests that the bandgap variations, related to the surface structures, extend through the entire thickness of the film. This point will be addressed in a later section. There has been a report of scratches influencing the optical properties of AlGaN films [15]. However, these were large enough to be observed in the SEM during the CL measurements, and the only effect they had was to lower the signal emission from the scratched area.
An interesting observation is that, in contrast to what is normally observed, the low energy CL image (figure 5(a)) displays sharper features than the high energy CL image (figure 5(b)). The finer features in CL images of the low-bandgap luminescence are often blurred by the diffusion of carriers from the surrounding high-bandgap material. The sharp features observed for the low-energy image are a further indication of the short diffusion length of the material, as discussed above. These features can also be caused by a region of low-energy material surrounded by thin layers of high energy material, preventing diffusion into the low-energy regions. In both cases, these sharp features suggest that the regions of low-bandgap material are smaller than their apparent size in the images.
Further evidence that the low-bandgap regions are small is given by the dependence of the luminescence on the probe current (the excitation density). By varying the electron beam current in the CL system, the excitation-density dependence of the luminescence from the epitaxial film can be probed. In figure 6, it was found that the FWHM of the luminescence peak decreased with increasing excitation density. By increasing the probe current by a factor of 50, the FWHM was decreased from 34 meV to 28 meV. One interpretation of the spectral sharpening is that the low-bandgap volumes are so small that they easily get saturated, and as the excitation density increases, the dominance of the luminescence from the high bandgap regions is even more pronounced.
A more detailed investigation of the luminescence variations can be performed by recording a series of CL spectra at points along a line on the sample. In figure 7 such a line scan is presented. The left side of the figure is an intensity plot of the CL along a randomly oriented line. The x and y axes in the intensity plot correspond to the emission energy and the spatial position along the line, respectively. The brightness of each pixel corresponds to the intensity recorded at that point (energy and spatial position). In order to enhance perception of the energy-position variations, contour curves are included in the image. On the right-hand side of figure 7, the individual CL spectra from points indicated by the connecting lines are presented.
An inspection of the line scan in figure 7 shows that the peak energy position
of the luminescence varies along the line. This implies that the intensity
variations observed in monochromatic CL images (figure 5 (a) and (c)) are
mainly related to shifts in the peak energy position and not to variations in
total intensity. This is corroborated by the complementary behavior of the high
and low energy images of figure 5 (a) and (c). The FWHM of the local
luminescence, as shown in the right side of figure 7, is narrower than the FWHM
of the peak formed by averaging the luminescence from a large region, figure 4.
This clearly shows that a large portion of the FWHM can be attributed to local
variations in the peak position. Furthermore, the peak energy position exhibits
discrete jumps with variations in spatial position, rather than a continuous
variation. However, the individual peak energy positions seem to be randomly
scattered over a range of
25 meV, where the discrete jumps could be
related to differences in the luminescence of the individual terraces and steps
along the line scan.
The structure along the growth direction can, in principle, be studied in top
view, by varying the acceleration voltage of the CL-SEM, and thereby the
penetration depth. By changing from 3 to 30 kV, the penetration depth changes
from
100 nm to
4000 nm. However, with an unclear excitation-density
dependence, artifacts may be introduced by variations in the depth profile of
the excitation density. In addition, as a first estimate, the minimum feature
size observed in CL increases linearly with penetration depth, due to the
larger in-plane scattering of the electrons. To avoid these difficulties in the
interpretation of the data, the vertical structure of the film was investigated
by recording cross-sectional CL images of the side of a cleaved sample, as
shown in figure 8. As before, the cleaved sample was mounted at an angle, in
this case
45 degrees, to avoid the edge effects in the SEM images, as
discussed above. The CL images were recorded at 3.69 eV (figure 8 (a)) and 3.75
eV (figure (b)). By comparing the two images, it was found that the high-energy
luminescence dominated close to the SiC interface, whereas the low-energy
luminescence dominated near the surface of the epitaxial film. This indicates a
gradient in the bandgap, high at the SiC interface and decreasing towards the
surface. A possible explanation for this behavior can be found by comparing
this result with a study of a
200 µm thick epitaxial layer of
GaN, grown on a sapphire substrate [16] [17]. Due to the smaller lattice
constant of sapphire, the GaN
is expected to grow under compressive strain. Most of this strain relaxes by
the formation of dislocations during the initial growth [18], and the major
part of a thick film is virtually strain free at the growth temperature.
In
contrast, in-situ
measurements of the strain has shown that GaN on a low-temperature AlN buffer
layer grows under tension
and that no relaxation takes place in films up to several µm of thickness
[19] However, due to the smaller thermal expansion coefficient of GaN compared
with sapphire (the sapphire substrate shrinks faster than the GaN), additional
compressive strain is introduced in the film as the layer cools down to room
temperature. This strain is relaxed starting from the surface, which means that
there is some residual compressive strain in the film near the sapphire
interface. This increases the bandgap of the GaN at the interface.
In the case of (Al)GaN on SiC, the lattice constant of SiC is also smaller and the film will initially grow under compressive strain. As in the case of sapphire substrates, this strain is gradually relaxed by the introduction of dislocations as the layer grows thicker. As the structure cools down to room temperature, the epitaxial film shrinks faster than the substrate, which introduces an additional tensile strain. At room temperature and at liquid helium temperature, there is therefore a strain gradient, with decreasing compressive strain towards the surface of the film. If the film is thick enough, the strain can change to tensile towards the surface. There is a discussion in the literature about whether the initial relaxation occurs over a few nm [18] or is more gradual [3]. It has been shown that thicker layers (> 3µm) of GaN on SiC are usually under tensile strain [4] [5], whereas thinner layers (< 0.7 µm) are under compressive strain [3] [6]. In addition, the compressive strain introduces an increase in the bandgap and the tensile strain introduces a decrease in the bandgap of AlGaN [4] [5]. In the sample shown in figure 8, there is a gradient in the bandgap, higher at the interface and lower at the surface. According to the discussion above, this indicates a decreasing compressive strain (or increasing tensile strain) with distance from the interface in the present sample.
CL images were recorded under the same conditions as the images of figure 8, varying the detected photon energy. In the case of figure 9, the energy was 3.66 eV, below the energy of the emission from the compressively strained region of the AlGaN film. With the present geometry of sample mounting, it is possible to simultaneously obtain cross-sectional, as well as, top view information, yielding semi three-dimensional information. The CL image, in figure 9, displays an interesting feature, a bright region indicated by the arrow on the left. This region extends straight from the SiC interface through the film to the surface, where it appears to continue along the surface in a random fashion, suggesting that this region is a vertical sheet of low-bandgap material.
The most probable cause of the regions emitting low-energy luminescence is a variation in composition, where these regions are Ga-rich. In order to justify this assumption, it has to be established that the main cause of the low-bandgap regions can be attributed to variations in the Ga-to-Al ratio in the AlGaN films. (i) The TEM investigation indicates that only the wurtzite polytype is present, excluding different polytypes (e.g. cubic AlGaN) as a source of the variations in the bandgap. (ii) We observe a gradient in the strain in the vertical direction of the film, as shown in figure 8. This is due to the lattice missmatch and the difference in thermal expansion coefficients of the SiC substrate and the AlGaN film. (iii) The variations in peak energy position, related to the lateral patterns observed in the CL images of figure 5 (a) and (c), penetrate the film vertically, as shown in figure 9. It is very unlikely that local variations in strain (i.e., inhomogeneous strain relaxation) would produce these structures that penetrate the entire film. Local variations in the strain could be introduced by alloy fluctuations, in which case these would still be the origin of the fluctuations in the energy position. (iv) Microcracks can introduce local relaxation of the film, and give rise to the type of patterns we observe [20]. However, neither the TEM nor the SEM investigation revealed any microcracks in the present films. (v) Segregation of impurities to grain boundaries have been shown to introduce line patterns in GaN films [21]. In this reference 20, the energy difference was 2-300 meV and the impurity was an acceptor. It is unlikely that the variations are caused by luminescence from impurities, since we observe a scatter over 25 meV in the peak energy position in the line scan in figure 7. If the variations were related to the presence of impurities, a discrete energy shift related to the impurity would be expected. Several different peak positions, as observed in figure 7, would require different impurities. (vi) Quantum effects can also be dismissed, since these require a variation in the bandgap to start with. In addition, quantum effects would increase the energy levels if the low bandgap regions were sufficiently small. This would lead to an underestimation of compositional variations. In conclusion, the observed local variations in the peak energy position of the luminescence are most probably caused by local variations in the Al-to-Ga ration in the AlxGa1-xN film. The extent of these variations is on scale of x±0.005.
There have been some reports on local deviation of the Al content during growth of AlGaN. The variations are mainly related to different facets introduced by growth defects. The facets have been either the funnels of nanopipes [22] or V-shaped defects connected to inversion domains [23]. However, in both cases, the Al content is increased on the additional facets. For growth on the non-planar substrates used in hetero-epitaxial lateral overgrowth, there can be a difference in Al incorporation between the terraces and the trenches. AlGaN, grown on 5 µm wide and 1 µm deep trenches exhibits a higher Ga content in the trenches than on the terraces [24] [25]. Dislocations, especially edge dislocations, can also be a source of an increase in Al incorporation [26] in AlGaN.
At
this stage, we will introduce a model for the structure of epitaxial films.
This model is shown in figure 10, and the epitaxial films consists of a thick
wurtzite AlGaN epitaxial film grown on a 6H-SiC (0001) substrate, which is
nominally exactly oriented and flat. The AlGaN grows with the c-axis
perpendicular to the surface of the SiC. The epitaxial film has a terrace-like
structure, where the width of the terrace is
2000 nm and the height of
the steps is
5 nm, indicating a local tilt of 0.2 degrees. The
steps are, in general, randomly distributed (spacing and directions) on the
surface. However, they can be preferentially formed in conjunction with
scratches on the substrate surface. These scratches are produced during the
mechanical polishing of the substrate. Due to differences in the surface
mobility of the Al and the Ga species, the incorporation of Ga is enhanced at
the steps, and narrow, Ga-rich regions are formed at the steps during growth.
While the steps remain on the growing surface, these regions extend vertically.
We believe that this is similar to the formation of vertical QWs and vertical
quantum wires in the AlGaAs system [27] [28].
Epitaxial
films of AlxGa1-xN (x
0.12) were investigated, mainly
using spatially resolved cathodoluminescence. The films were found to have a
strain gradient, with decreasing compressive strain from the substrate
interface to the surface. This gradient is believed to originate in a gradual
relaxation of the initial compressive strain, as the films grew thicker, in
combination with a general tensile strain, introduced as the film cools down
from the growth temperature. Spatial variations, on a sub-micrometer scale, in
the luminescence in the plane of the epitaxial film were suggested to originate
in variations in the composition, on a scale of x±0.005. These
variations seem to stem from the surface of the substrate, where Ga-rich (low
bandgap) material is preferentially formed at scratches on the substrate
surface. The Ga-rich regions extend through the epitaxial film, in the growth
direction. In addition, we have demonstrated the power of the CL technique as a
tool for studying compositional variations on a sub-micrometer scale.
[1] S. Nakamura, Mater. Res. Bull. 23, 37 (1998).
[2] M. Asif Khan, J. N. Kuznia, D. T. Olson , R. Kaplan , J. Appl. Phys. 73, 3108-3110 (1993).
[3] W.G. Perry, T. Zheleva, M.D. Bremser, R.F Davis, W. Shan, J.J. Song, J. Electron. Mater. 26, 224-231 (1997).
[4] W Shan, RJ Hauenstein, AJ Fischer, JJ Song, WG Perry, MD Bremser, RF Davis, B Goldenberg, Phys. Rev. B 54, 13460 (1996).
[5] W Shan, AJ Fischer, SJ Hwang, BD Little, RJ Hauenstein, XC Xie, JJ Song, DS Kim, B Goldenberg, R Horning, S Krishnankutty, WG Perry, MD Bremser, RF Davis, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 455 (1998).
[6] NV Edwards, MD Bremser, RF Davis, AD Batchelor, SD Yoo, CF Karan, DE Aspnes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2808 (1998).
[7] G Popovici, W Kim, A Botchkarev, H Tang, H Morkoccedil, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3385 (1997).
[8] S. Tanaka, S. Iwai, Y. Aoyagi, J. Cryst. Growth 170, 329-334 (1997).
[9] F. A. Ponce, MRS Bull. 22, 51-57 (1997).
[10] J.I. Goldstein, D.E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D.C. Joy, A.D. Romig, C.E. Lyman, C. Fiori, E. Lifshin, Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis (Plenum Press, New York, 1992) .
[11] Shigefusa Chichibu, Kazumi Wada, Shuji Nakamura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2346-2348 (1997).
[12] B. Monemar, Phys. Rev. B 10, 676 (1974).
[13] M. D. Bremser, W. G. Perry, T. Zheleva, N. V. Edwards, O. H. Nam, N. Parikh, D. E. Aspnes, Robert F. Davis, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 1, 8 (1996).
[14] W Shan, AJ Fischer, JJ Song, GE Bulman, HS Kong, MT Leonard, WG Perry, MD Bremser, RF Davis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 740-742 (1996).
[15] G. Steude, T. Christmann, B.K. Meyer, A. Goeldner, A. Hoffmann, F. Bertram, J. Christen, H. Amano, I. Akasaki, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4S1, G3.26 (1999).
[16] A Hoffmann, J Christen, H Siegle, F Bertram, D Schmidt, L Eckey, C Thomsen, K Hiramatsu, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 50, 192 (1997).
[17] H. Siegle, A. Hoffman, L. Eckey, C. Thomsen, J. Christen, F. Bertram, D. Schmidt, D. Rudloff, K. Hiramatsu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2490 (1997).
[18] K. Hiramatsu, T. Detchprohm, J. Akasaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1528 (1993).
[19] S Hearne, E Chason, J Han, J A Floro, J Figiel, J Hunter, H Amano, I S T Tsong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 356 (1999).
[20] CE Norman, RA Hogg, AJ Shields, N Iizuka, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 216, 375 (1999).
[21] Carol Trager-Cowan , P. G. Middleton, K. P. O'Donnell, S. Ruffenach-Clur, Olivier Briot, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 2, 31 (1997).
[22] J Kang, S Tsunekawa, B Shen, Z Mai, C Wang, T Tsuru, A Kasuya, J. Cryst. Growth 229, 58 (2001).
[23] B Pecz, Zs Makkai, MA di Forte-Poisson, F Huet, RE Dunin-Borkowski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1529 (2001).
[24] M Iwaya, S Terao, T Sano, T Ukai, R Nakamura, S Kamiyama, H Amano, I Akasaki, J. Cryst. Growth 237-9, 951-5 (2002).
[25] T Riemann, J Christen, A Kaschner, A Laades, A Hoffmann, C Thomsen, M Iwaya, S Kamiyama, H Amano, I Akasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3093 (2002).
[26] L Chang, SK Lai, FR Chen, JJ Kai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 928 (2001).
[27] A Hartmann, L Loubies, F Reinhardt, E Kapon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1314 (1997).
[28] E Martinet, A Gustafsson, G Biasiol, F Reinhardt, E Kapon, K Leifer, Phys. Rev. B 56, R7093 (1997).
| Figure 1. FSEM image of the cleaved edge of the epitaxial film. |
| Figure 2. AFM image of the surface of a 6H-SiC substrate. The image reveals scratches on the surface, resulting from mechanical polishing. |
| Figure 3. AFM image of the surface of an AlGaN epitaxial layer. The arrows indicate structures assumed to originate from scratches on the surface of the substrate. |
| Figure 4. Spatially averaged spectrum of an AlGaN epitaxial film. |
| Figure 7. A series of cathodoluminescence spectra recorded in spot mode along a line on an AlGaN film. |
| Figure 9. Monochromatic CL images from the cleaved edge of an AlGaN epitaxial film, with the same mounting as the sample in figure 8 |
| Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the model for the epitaxial AlGaN film. |
© 2002 The Materials Research Society
|