|
Volume 5, Article 2
R. Dietrich, A. Wieszt, A. Vescan, H. Leier
DaimlerChrylser AG, Ulm, Germany
Joan M. Redwing, Karim S. Boutros
Epitronics/ATMI
K. Kornitzer, R. Freitag, T. Ebner, K. Thonke
Universität Ulm, Abteilung Halbleiterphysik, Germany
Mesa isolation was achieved by RIE dry etching with a photoresist mask. The ohmic metallisation consisted of a Ti/Al/Ni/Au layer structure. Pt/Au was evaporated for the gate contacts.
Hall measurements at RT yield mobilities of μ=1900 cm2/Vs and sheet carrier concentrations of ns=3.5·1012/cm2. For a fully strained AlGaN layer with an Al mole fraction of 30%, a piezoelectrically induced sheet charge of above 1013/cm2 is expected [3]. The discrepancy between the measured and the expected carrier concentration may arise from relaxation of the Al0.3GaN layer or from trapping effects. The ohmic contact resistance Rc varies between 0.6 and 0.9 Ωmm after alloying at 900°C in N2 ambient.
Figure 1 shows the output characteristic of a 20 μm device. The FET sustains its maximum drain current of 540 mA/mm up to VDS=49 V (Figure 1). The corresponding power dissipation of 26.5 W/mm did not destroy the device due to the excellent thermal conductivity of the SiC substrate. This measurement was carried out under UV-illumination with a Hg-lamp. In order to obtain a well defined state of the device these conditions were chosen since the device performance is dependent on the previous biasing conditions, as discussed below.
Measuring the output characteristic of the FETs under room light, a drastic current reduction is observed when the device is measured for a second time, 10 s after the first measurement. Figure 2 shows the topmost traces of the output characteristics measured for the first time (device was at equilibrium), 10 seconds later and a third time after a brief UV-illumination. Obviously, the current reduction can be removed by incident photons. This current reduction can equally be removed by applying a drain voltage VDS>25 V. Before measuring this trace, the device was pinched off at VGS0=-10 V for 5 min to get a pronounced current reduction (dotted line). The sudden removal of the current reduction at VDS>25 V can be explained by field enhanced carrier emission from traps. At VDS=25 V the electrical field between drain and gate is at least 20 MV/m.
It is observed that the current reduction is influenced by the "history" of the gate voltage. Hence, the transients of the drain current ID at fixed drain and gate biases were studied for different gate pre-biasing conditions. This pre-biasing is denoted by the superscript 0. Figure 3 shows the results of ID(t). Before t=0, the device was pre-biased for 5 min at the VGS0 value indicated in the figure and at VDS0=100 mV. At t=0, the device was turned on (VGS=0 V) and ID was recorded for 20 000 s. A low VDS value was applied in order not to influence the current recovery process by the applied drain voltage. As the drain current is very sensitive to incident light, the whole measurement was carried out in the dark and prior to each measurement the device was kept for 5 hours at zero bias in the dark to achieve approximately thermodynamic equilibrium. The current reduction effect becomes more pronounced as a lower pre-biasing value VGS0 is chosen.
After VGS0=-10 V it takes the drain current several seconds to reach even 1% of its saturation value. At such a heavy pre-biasing, ID(t) has a point of inflection indicating a second order effect. No point of infliction is observed for VGS0≥-5 V. The transients can be divided into two regions: A region of fast current increase (0≤t≤1000 s) and a region of slow current increase (t>1000 s). These results may be explained assuming that traps are responsible for the current reduction. However, the location of the traps cannot be identified from these experiments. Charged deep levels in the region below the gate may deplete the channel of mobile carriers. Also, under large negative gate bias, the lateral field between gate and drain may lead to a charge redistribution on the surface or in the AlGaN barrier layer.
Assuming the existence of traps in the semiconductor or on the surface, the following simple approach can be pursued to explain the observed current reduction: If the traps can be negatively charged, this immobile charge depletes the channel and limits the drain current. As a result, after turning on the device, the channel remains highly resistive. Subsequently, the system relaxes slowly towards its equilibrium state by emission of the trapped electrons and the drain current builds up. Invoking the principle of detailed balance and neglecting hole emission from the traps, the time constant τ of the build-up process should follow the relationship [4]:
| (1) |
| (2) |
Using this approach, the transients measured at different temperatures (RT—280°C, Figure 4) were fitted with ( Equation 2) and the time constant τ was extracted. From the temperature dependence of τ an activation energy Ea=280 meV and a capture cross section of 4.4·10-18cm2 are extracted from the Arrhenius-plot as depicted in Figure 5.
To investigate the region of slow drain current increase we studied the wavelength dependence of the steady state drain current ID∞. The device was biased at VGS=0 V and VDS=100 mV for one day in the dark before Id∞(dark) was measured. In the following the device was illuminated with a light intensity of 0.4 W/m2 with the wavelengths λ= 1500 nm, 1200 nm and the values indicated in Figure 6. The corresponding drain current was measured after 10,000 s of constant illumination. For the long wavelengths we used a halogen lamp and a monochromator for wavelength selection. A Xe-lamp was used for the short wavelengths. At λ=1500 nm and 1200 nm no significant current variation was observed. For λ≤900 nm ID increased. The energy of the onset of the current increase is well below the bandgap energy of GaN. The results indicate, that the material exhibits pronounced persistent photoconductivity (PPC).
[1]K. Chu, B. Green, L.F. Eastman, "AlGaN/GaN ‘-HEMT‘s for High Power Microwave Amplifiers", MRS Meeting (4/13-17, 1998), CA, USA (No journal name recognized.)
[2] S. T. Sheppard, K. Doverspike, W. L. Pribble, S. T. Allen, J. W. Palmour, L. T. Kehias, T. J. Jenkins, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 20, 161 (1999).
[3] O. Ambacher, J. Smart, J. R. Shealy, N. G. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, W. J. Schaff, L. F. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, L. Wittmer, M. Stutzmann, W. Rieger, J. Hilsenbeck, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3222 (1999).
[4]D.K. Schroder, "Semiconductor material and device characterization", John Wiley Sons, New York (1990) (No journal name recognized.)
[5] A.Y. Polyakov, N.B. Smirnov, A.V. Govorkov, M. Shin, M. Skowronski, D.W. Greve, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 870-876 (1998).
[6] M. T. Hirsch, J. A. Wolk, W. Walukiewicz, E. E. Haller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1098 (1997).
[7] H. M. Chen, Y. F. Chen, M. C. Lee, M. S. Feng, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 899 (1997).
[8] C. H. Qiu, J. Y. Pankove, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1983 (1997).
| Figure 1. Output characteristic measured under UV-illumination. |
| Figure 4. Drain-current transients measured at different temperatures with VGS=1 V and VDS=6 V. Prior to the measurement the device was pre-biased at VGS0=-10 V and VDS0=6 V for 5 min. |
| Figure 5. Arrhenius-plot of the time constants τ determined from the drain current transients measured at different temperatures. |
| Figure 6. Steady state drain-currents for VDS=100 mV and VGS=0 V. The light intensity is 0.4 W/m2. |
© 2000 The Materials Research Society
|